Using Analytical Network Process to Find Priorities Weights of Contractors Pre-Qualification
Abstract
AbstractThe chosen of construction contractors were one of the most important activate of owners. Without a right and fitted ways for chosen the most suitable contractors the execution of construction project will be influenced via multi-criteria decisions making (MCDM) was proposed to an applicable way for contractor choice. For finish decisions problems, the analytic network process (ANP) is large recommendation therefore; ANP lets inter-dependent affected specify in the model. researcher find the main criteria and there weights to build new program computer software models, to find the best contractors (optimum contractors) by using super decision software program. ANP is strong instrument to structured many decisions problems and deals with inter-dependent between construction project indicators. In this study, ANP decision model developed by used expert opinions from pre-qualification construction contractors. The primary findings of this study are applied to exploring the relative important of a set of construction project condition and construction method indicators on the choice of construction project ways under cost and time. Keywords: Analytic network process, pre-qualification, main criteria, contractor, interactionCite this Article Sawsan R. Mohamed, Raafat Ali Majeed. Using Analytical Network Process to Find Priorities' Weights of Contractors Pre-Qualification. Journal of Construction Engineering, Technology & Management. 2016; 6(2): 88–93p.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the manuscript entitled ‘______________’, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the Journal, is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
I/ We have read the final version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship. We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name Signature (s)
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________