Controller Performance Assessment (CPA) of Intelligent Control for Non-linear System
Keywords:
Controller performance assessment (CPA), classical controller, fuzzy logic controller, NARMA-l2 neural controller, nonlinear systemAbstract
The objective of this paper is to design and undertake comparative analysis of classical and intelligent controllers for nonlinear system. These controllers are compared based on controller performance assessment in which the different parameters as overshoot, steady-state error, rise time, settling time, response of reference change and output variance are analyzed. To achieve these objectives, the water tank control problem as nonlinear system has been built in Simulink and implementations traditionally classical controller and advance intelligent controller as fuzzy logic and neural network are performed. In classical controller, the proposal-integral control law is used as control algorithm. Sugeno model is used for FL controller, while back propagation algorithm is used to train the NARMA-l2 neural network control. Three controllers are designed and their performances are compared.Keywords: Controller performance assessment (CPA), classical controller, fuzzy logic controller, NARMA-l2 neural controller, nonlinear systemDownloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
· I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
· I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
· I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
· I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
_______________
We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |