A Survey on Recent Approaches for Leakage Power Reduction in MOS Integrated Circuits
Abstrakt
Today the integrated circuit’s functionalities are increasing day by day with increase in the number of transistors in it. However, the scaling of the transistors, top increase its number, for the same area of an IC reduces its sub-threshold voltage with its increase in the leakage power consumption. Scaling at different scales (45, 60, 90 nm, etc.) leads to major losses, both at static and dynamic phases of the circuits. Power consumption is based on the number of elements and its fabrication [1] with its orientation and connections in an integrated circuit. It is the dominant factor in today’s scenario for any VLSI circuit designer as reported by ITRS [2]. Different techniques such as stack [3, 4], sleepy stack [5, 6], sleepy keeper [3], leakage feedback with stack [4], etc., were developed to reduce leakage power consumption at the cost of delay and area penalty. Here the author makes a review of all the different approaches which have overcome the critical parameters such as area and delay penalty with high performance and increased density to greater extent. Keywords: Stack, sleepy stack, leakage feedback, sleepy keeperPublikováno
Číslo
Sekce
Licence
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
· I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
· I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
· I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
· I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. _______________
We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |