An Explicit Approach to Compare Crosstalk Noise and Delay in VLSI RLC Interconnect Modeled with Skin Effect with Step and Ramp Input
Nøgleord:
VLSI, RLC, interconnect, crosstalk, delay calculationResumé
As the technology is acquiring frequency of the Giga-hertz range noise and delay calculations and avoidance of such factors in VLSI interconnects have become dominant to be considered. This paper represents a comparison between the crosstalk noise voltage level measured when the RLC on-chip interconnect was modeled when the skin effect was considered under step input and the crosstalk voltage measured when the RLC line was modeled with skin effect under ramp input. In this paper, we have proposed a detailed discussion about the relevance of the input applied to any interconnect that can affect the whole system integrity. The importance and dominance of the skin effect cannot be ignored. But apart from the high frequency effect like skin effect and proximity effect, it is also very important to observe that these factors may harm the system integrity if the wrong input is applied. This paper reflects the approximated noise and delay variations in different cases of inputs applied to the Global RLC interconnect.Downloads
Publiceret
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
· I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
· I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
· I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
· I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. _______________
We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |