Comparative Analysis of High Speed Comparator for A to D Converters
Abstract
In this paper dynamic comparator along with the output buffer stage has been introduced. The simulation is carried out in 130 and 90 nm technologies. The supply voltage for 130 nm is 1.3 V and for 90 nm is 0.9 V. Different analyses for various characteristics of the comparator such as ICMR, delay, offset voltage and power dissipation is carried out in 130 and 90 nm CMOS technology. The comparator benefits from two stages and two operational phases to reduce the offset voltage caused by the mismatch inside the positive feedback circuit. The simulation result shows speed 6.71 and 5.04 GHz with the power dissipation 13.04 and 86.11 µW in 90 and 130 nm technologies respectively. The power consumption and offset voltage of the comparator present in this paper is less in comparison to conventional comparator. The simulation results allow the circuit designer to fully explore the tradeoffs in comparator design. Keywords: CMOS, MOSFET, comparator, ICMR, offset voltage, power dissipationCite this Article Gandhi Priyesh P, Rathod Neha B, Devashrayee N.M. Comparative Analysis of High Speed Comparator for A to D Converters. Journal of VLSI Design Tools and Technology (JoVDTT). 2015; 5(2): 4–10p.Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
· I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
· I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
· I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
· I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. _______________
We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |