Comparative Analysis of Low-Power Adiabatic Techniques
Ключевые слова:
clock power, adiabatic switching, energy dissipation, ac power supply, ECRL logic circuit, PFAL logic circuitАннотация
In today’s modern era, new revolutionary designs are replacing old traditional bulky designs. Due to advancements in technology, low-power designs are in demand. Advantages of adiabatic technique can be used for overcoming disadvantages of typical CMOS such as dissipated energy loss. Adiabatic techniques are extremely reliant on parameter changes. In this paper, the merits of adiabatic techniques are depicted on the basis of parameter variations. By the use of SPICE simulation, traditional CMOS inverter is compared with two adiabatic techniques, positive feedback adiabatic logic (PFAL) inverter and efficient charge recovery logic (ECRL) inverter on 125 and 90 nm technology. The results show that adiabatic logic circuits are better energy-reducing techniques than typical CMOS logic circuit. Keywords: Clock power, adiabatic switching, energy dissipation, AC power supply, ECRL logic circuit, PFAL logic circuit
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
· I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
· I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
· I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
· I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. _______________
We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |
