Analysis and Characterization of Different Topologies of Dynamic Latch based CMOS Comparators for Delay, Offset and Power
Ключевые слова:
Comparator, static comparator, dynamic comparator, double tail comparator, two stage dynamic comparatorАннотация
This paper presents the analysis and characterization of various topologies of dynamic latch based complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) comparator. Various comparator topologies like resistor divider comparator (RDC), differential pair comparator (DPC), double-tail dynamic latched comparator (DTDLC), energy efficient two stage comparator (ETWC) and two-stage dynamic comparator (TSDL) are analyzed and compared for various performance parameters. Besides zero static power consumption, resistor divider comparator has high offset voltage and it depends on the input differential common mode voltage. Differential pair comparator having less delay and less offset voltage compared to resistor divider comparator, but requires more voltage headroom. To overcome the drawbacks of differential comparator, double tail dynamic latch comparator can be used, but at cost of low speed and high power consumption. For low offset voltage (high resolution) applications, Two-stage dynamic comparator is preferred. This paper provides analysis and characterization review about a variety of traditional dynamic latched comparator designs - in terms of delay, power, area, power delay product and input referred offset voltage in HSPICE simulation tool using 90nm PTM technology. Keywords: Comparator, static comparator, dynamic comparator. double tail comparator. two stage dynamic comparatorCite this Article Vijay Savani, N. M. Devashrayee. Analysis and Characterization of Different Topologies of Dynamic Latch based CMOS Comparators for Delay, Offset and Power. Journal of VLSI Design Tools and Technology. 2016; 6(2): 86–98p.Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
· I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
· I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
· I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
· I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. _______________
We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |